Search This Blog
Showing posts with label Black Panther. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Black Panther. Show all posts
Sunday, August 25, 2019
May 6, 2022!!
'Black Panther' Sequel Release Date Revealed
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/black-panther-marvel-studios-2022_n_5d6188f7e4b0b59d25758f68
Monday, December 31, 2018
In the Year 2018, This Happened
By the end of 2018, the following films will have either 'rocked' the theaters or 'bombed' in the theaters.
Editor's Note: This video was posted on Friday, July 21, 2017.
Editor's Note: The "New Mutants" movie is now scheduled for release on August 2, 2019; X-Men: Dark Phoenix is now scheduled for release on June 7, 2019.
Editor's Note: As of 12/31/2018, my status on whether I've seen the above list:
Editor's Note: This video was posted on Friday, July 21, 2017.
Editor's Note: The "New Mutants" movie is now scheduled for release on August 2, 2019; X-Men: Dark Phoenix is now scheduled for release on June 7, 2019.
Editor's Note: As of 12/31/2018, my status on whether I've seen the above list:
- Yes!!Thor: Ragnarok - saw by myself
- Yes!!Justice League - saw with Megan
- Yes!!Black Panther - saw by myself
- was not released in 2018
New Mutants - Yes!!Avengers: Infinity War - saw by myself twice
- NO Deadpool 2
- Yes!!The Incredibles 2 - saw with Megan
- Yes!!Ant-Man and the Wasp - saw with Karen
- NO Venom
- was not released in 2018
X-Men: Dark Phoenix - Yes!!Aquaman - saw by myself
Friday, February 9, 2018
Thursday, February 1, 2018
Noteworthy to Mention
Just to set up the situation, Marvel’s next big movie, Black Panther, will be released on Feb. 16. It will be followed by Avengers: Infinity War on May 4 and Ant-Man and the Wasp on July 6 - and I've embedded the trailers below.
I grew up reading comic books. My favorite was "Justice League" because I loved the way the heroes would split off into teams to go on their own adventure within the context of the larger story. The best example is issue #200 (link below) because it combined the 'old' heroes with the 'new' heroes of the Justice League in an imaginative way.
Personally, I think there's just so many opportunities for the future of the MCU, even if the X-Men, Marvel Universe crossover may not happen for years, Marvel Studios boss says - If it happens at all By Julia Alexander Jan 31, 2018, 9:02am EST.. From my perspective, it's very interesting how the MCU in movies has existed for quite some time - the Wikipedia page has the details about when it started and the chronological order of the movies.
And, just to catch up, here are the best trailers from last month:
Here's a link to information about Justice League issue #200: http://dc.wikia.com/wiki/Justice_League_of_America_Vol_1_200
I grew up reading comic books. My favorite was "Justice League" because I loved the way the heroes would split off into teams to go on their own adventure within the context of the larger story. The best example is issue #200 (link below) because it combined the 'old' heroes with the 'new' heroes of the Justice League in an imaginative way.
Personally, I think there's just so many opportunities for the future of the MCU, even if the X-Men, Marvel Universe crossover may not happen for years, Marvel Studios boss says - If it happens at all By Julia Alexander Jan 31, 2018, 9:02am EST.. From my perspective, it's very interesting how the MCU in movies has existed for quite some time - the Wikipedia page has the details about when it started and the chronological order of the movies.
And, just to catch up, here are the best trailers from last month:
Here's a link to information about Justice League issue #200: http://dc.wikia.com/wiki/Justice_League_of_America_Vol_1_200
Tuesday, January 23, 2018
Is This Really a Spoiler? Just in Case: SPOILER WARNING!
On the Internet, there's a lot of sites that publish movie and TV show reviews that often have a giant disclaimer "SPOILER WARNING!" as a way for the reader to stop reading if they don't want to know what happens in the movie or the TV show.
I'm wondering when a spoiler warning is really warranted. Case in point, I watch the show "This is Us" on NBC on Tuesday nights. The previous episodes have made it clear that a major character is dead - we've seen the aftermath of his death played out in the living characters on the show.
Thus, I came to this article - with a major spoiler in the title and wondered what the parameters are for issuing a spoiler warning? Is it assumed that if I click on the articles title, I already have watched the previous episodes and know that the major character is dead?
What about for every single article about TV shows that are done? In this era of binge watching TV shows on services like Netflix, does every article about "Lost" or "Prison Break" need a spoiler warning? What if I come across a TV review that was originally published the day after a major event on either of those shows? If I am binge watching, and haven't made it up to the episode being reviewed....
It'd suck to be the one to ruin a show for someone else. I've read spoilers about movies before I see them in the past because I want to know what to look for in the movie. I knew, for example that HS died in a recent Star Wars film, before I saw it. I wanted to watch for nuances that the director inserted as it progressed to that scene. Perhaps the line in the sand can be drawn between movies based upon actual events are exempt from needing to have a spoiler warning whereas movies that are fictional do. For example, articles that were published when the "Titanic" movie was released didn't include a spoiler warning about the ship's status at the end of the movie, right? But if I go to "Black Panther" next month and don't want to know the plot or how it ends (though seeing the character in the trailer for "Avengers: Infinity War" tells me that the character survives whatever dangerous situation he encounters in the movie), then I should be able to shut down my news feeds and walk in 'cold' and without prior knowledge.
I'm wondering when a spoiler warning is really warranted. Case in point, I watch the show "This is Us" on NBC on Tuesday nights. The previous episodes have made it clear that a major character is dead - we've seen the aftermath of his death played out in the living characters on the show.
Thus, I came to this article - with a major spoiler in the title and wondered what the parameters are for issuing a spoiler warning? Is it assumed that if I click on the articles title, I already have watched the previous episodes and know that the major character is dead?
What about for every single article about TV shows that are done? In this era of binge watching TV shows on services like Netflix, does every article about "Lost" or "Prison Break" need a spoiler warning? What if I come across a TV review that was originally published the day after a major event on either of those shows? If I am binge watching, and haven't made it up to the episode being reviewed....
It'd suck to be the one to ruin a show for someone else. I've read spoilers about movies before I see them in the past because I want to know what to look for in the movie. I knew, for example that HS died in a recent Star Wars film, before I saw it. I wanted to watch for nuances that the director inserted as it progressed to that scene. Perhaps the line in the sand can be drawn between movies based upon actual events are exempt from needing to have a spoiler warning whereas movies that are fictional do. For example, articles that were published when the "Titanic" movie was released didn't include a spoiler warning about the ship's status at the end of the movie, right? But if I go to "Black Panther" next month and don't want to know the plot or how it ends (though seeing the character in the trailer for "Avengers: Infinity War" tells me that the character survives whatever dangerous situation he encounters in the movie), then I should be able to shut down my news feeds and walk in 'cold' and without prior knowledge.
Monday, October 16, 2017
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)