Scott Jennings MIC DROP last night on CNN: Why doesn't anyone at CNN want to discuss the division amongst the democrats in Texas?
Jasmine Crockett isn't doing ANYTHING to help James Talarico.
JENNINGS: "Nobody around here seems to want to talk about the fact that Jasmine Crockett does nothing for James Talarico after that very divisive primary."
"I think Talarico has problems on his left flank. I think he has problems with African-American voters down there. It's the same for El-Sayed in Michigan."
CNN can keep talking about Republican infighting. That won't make the Democrats' problems in Texas and Michigan disappear.
This Kmele Foster guy put this wacky liberal in her place last night on CNN!
Kmele Foster: “It's one thing to not think capitalism isn't working, ideally. It's another thing entirely to insist that it is oppressive, that it is bound up with white supremacy.”
Jemele Hill: “How is it not?”
Kmele Foster: “I've always preferred Adam Smith's description of capitalism as the natural system of liberty. The idea that people can own property, that they can exchange it freely with one another for profit, that they can find ways to put their resources to good use and profit in a way that is actually beneficial to everyone else, that there can be gains from trade that are mutually beneficial. These are foundational ideas that have created more wealth than any other system in human history. That is what capitalism is. That is not white supremacy.”
Jemele Hill: “Do you think capitalism has always worked that way?”
Kmele Foster: “I’ve actually just described the basic facts of the economics.”
Hill: “That ain't how it's always worked.”
Kmele Foster: “Slavery is an institution that is older than writing. It predates capitalism. The notion that white supremacy and all these other things are bound up with capitalism in an intrinsic and fundamental way is so absurd and laughable, it barely needs to be defended.”
Jemele Hill: “How was it absurd?”
Kmele Foster: “It barely needs to be defended.”
Jemele Hill: “What do you mean it barely needs to be defended?”
Kmele Foster: “You actually have to articulate what the connections is. How are these two things the same? I'm talking about private property, the right to exchange and sell with whomever you like. What does that have to do with white supremacy?… What is the white supremacy dynamic of private property?”
A Democrat said El-Sayed is going to win Michigan…
Jennings didn’t hesitate:
“Before you speak to Republicans and Independents, you might wanna speak to the black voters in DETROIT. They’re NONE too pleased with Abdul El-Sayed — they’re interested in MIKE ROGERS.
That’s the biggest weakness in these socialist candidates. The Democratic coalition depends on black voters… and they’re not there on socialism.”
Detroit isn’t buying it.
Rogers is running up the score while the left keeps pushing socialism.
When I think about someone else could possibly be laid off from their job, I don't envy their situation.... even if it is Don Lemon and speculation from Ben Shapiro. It hapened to me 2505 days (6 years, 10 months, 1 week, 2 days_ ago) on January 26, 2016. It will always be "fresh" in my head.
Back on 2/22/2021, I had my second vaccine shot scheduled for Sunday, 2/28/2021 at 2 PM at UIHC. Also, on that same day, when Luka Garza became the all-time leading scorer on the Iowa Hawkeye basketball team, this article was published in which Dr. Anthony Fauci declared that it is possible that people will be wearing a mask up to a year from 2-21-2021 - refresh your memory, if you want: Dr. Anthony Fauci talks about wearing a mask in the future.
I plan to remember this post prior to its automatic publish on 2/22/2022 so that I may update it with what is actually happening in February 2022:
Update on 2-21-2022: Yes, we are all wearing masks.
"If we want to protect the children, particularly those who are not
yet eligible for vaccination, you want to surround the children with
people who are vaccinated, teachers, school personnel, everyone else.
But also in order to protect those who can't get vaccinated. There are
certain simple things you have to do. You mentioned one of them,
universal masking in the school, and even though there are, you know,
some government leaders locally who are trying to push back on that, we
have to get the school system masked, in addition to surrounding the
children with vaccinated people.
"That's the solution. We don't need to see a big uptick at all in cases if we do it right."
"The trouble is, as you know, politics still trump the science,
right? You listen for instance to the governor of Florida, one of the
states of course that has banned mask mandates. The way he described
vaccinations was really remarkable, and again, defies the science. I
want to play it now, just describing who the vaccine is for. Have a
listen, I want to get your reaction," Sciutto said.
The vaccines have helped people ward of severe
illness, and we obviously work hard to distribute it. At the end of the
day, though, it is about your health and whether you want that
protection or not. It really doesn't impact me or anyone else.
Sciutto asked Fauci to explain why that's false.
"Well, that's not true at all. I mean, obviously it's important for
you as an individual, for your own personal protection, safety and
health. but when you have a virus that's circulating in the community,
and you are not vaccinated, you are part of the problem because you're
allowing yourself to be a vehicle for the virus to be spreading to
someone else," Fauci said.
"So it isn't as if it stops with you. If that were the case, then it
would be only about you. But it doesn't. You can get infected even if
you get no symptoms or are minimally symptomatic and then pass it on to
someone who might, in fact, might be very vulnerable, an elderly person,
a person with an underlying disease, so when you're dealing with an
outbreak of an infectious disease, it isn't only about you. There's a
societal responsibility we all have."
Editor's Note: I used the Idiots and Stupid People tags because that's what I think about the drug manufacturer, who has a drug that would save a littler girl's life, but the slant of the article from CNN is that the company is putting $ as a higher priority than a human life. In general, I consider myself a 'supply and demand' type of Capitalist, but I wonder where I draw the line. It feels like the CEO is being greedy by allowing this little girl to die when he has the drug at his disposal to help her. Again, I typically embrace Capitalism and the idea that if you have something a lot of people want, you can charge whatever price you want. Yet, if I were the CEO quoted in the article, I don't believe I would be sleeping well at night.